In Which I Develop a New Respect for the Black Rat

Let's take a Bulletman break, courtesy of Bulletman #6!

I guess it was decided the Bullet had enough of a rogues gallery that we could see them teaming up.  So, the Revenge Syndicate was born:

The Black Rat and the Murder Prophet were covered in previous posts.  The third guy, the Weeper, had given the Bullets some grief over in Master Comics, which I don't think I have access to.  So, if you know of anyone who has any issues of Master Comics, please send them my way because I loves me some Captain Marvel Jr.

Anyway, the Weeper was arguably the most entertaining:

You see, the Weeper was sad all the time.  Even when he was successful, he saw the down side of it.  But he was a true "misery loves company" kind of guy, because he wouldn't put up with anyone else being happy, either.  The guy just hated happiness.  He kind of reminds me of Eeyore from Winnie the Pooh.

Here was an interesting side of the Black Rat:

You know, I would have expected the guy to just say something along the lines of "Awesome!  More money for me!"  But he actually saves his allies.  I'm not saying that makes him a great guy, but I don't see Victor von Doom doing that very often.  Basically, if you were under a car at the bottom of the river, Vic decided you were too useless to live.

Anyhoo:

I know what you're thinking from what he just said: The Black Rat is going to keep them around as long as he has use for him, but then he's going to bump them off.  The thing is, he doesn't.  We don't see so much as a single thought balloon that the guy has any intentions of betraying his alliance.  That kind of honor is downright strange among bad guys in comics.

This tickled me:

See?  I'm actually taking a shine to the Black Rat.  I didn't see that coming.

Anyway, this version of the Weeper isn't the Weeper I first knew about from Justice League of America #136 (volume 1) or this issue of The Joker:

And no, it isn't because the Weeper was originally a Fawcett character.  Nope.  In fact, the original Weeper returned in an episode of Batman: The Brave and the Bold in 2011:

Because Batman: The Brave and the Bold was all kinds of awesome.

So, what happened?  Well, you can look it up, but I'll reveal all when we get around to the original Weeper's final comic book appearance in Bulletman #10 in the next couple of weeks.

Longtime reader pal Wayne Sallee has sent a few choice panels we'll be looking at over the next few days.  Here's some Fun with Out of Context Dialogue (tm!) from what I believe is a Silver Age Captain Atom comic:

"Weirdo" is a term, you didn't see a lot in comics.  The trick now is that the next time you give a toddler a juice box, you're going to have resist the urge to say, "Let's see how you like juice, weirdo!"  I'm not at all sure I can do that.

Let's finish things up with another installment of Well... Touche! (tm!) taken from today's ish of Bulletman:

Well.... Touche! (tm!)

See you Monday!

Superman Heroically Fights the Guy in a Green Bathrobe and Red Polka-Dotted Nightcap

I'm still going through the first issue of Superman.  And bear with me, because it's a biggun.

Superman had a bit more 'tude in the early years.  It lent itself to several moments of

Well.... Touche! (tm!)

For instance:

Well.... Touche! (tm!)

Well.... Touche! (tm!)

Well.... Touche! (tm!)

Notice how Superman doesn't have the red boots on?  Unlike the occasionally disappearing cape or trunks, I think this was deliberate, because it carries over into other stories.

Here's a moment from Superman's early days he'd probably like you to forget:

Yup.  There was no such thing as Kryptonite back in the day, so what you saw there was Superman getting pushed off a boat by a couple of goons.  Yes.  That happened.

EDIT:  So, was Superman simply clumsy and fell off the boat, or was he pushed?  In my original post, I didn't include this panel:

So, were the thugs simply boasting, or was Superman actually shoved overboard in between panels?  I guess he could have been shoved and then "braced himself" against the rail.  Perhaps we'll never know.  We can only agree that one way or another, Supes landed unceremoniously in the drink. 

I also like Superman's attitude towards Lois:

That's right, Clark!  Keep her guessing!

That was probably in response to Lois's terrible attitude problem with Clark when he was in his secret ID.  I can't say I'd be above it, either.  Make me a sandwich, Lois, and perhaps I'll save you the next time you place your life in danger.  Yeah.  That would be me.

See you tomorrow!

Superman and the Phallic Shaped Baby-Carrying Rocket from Another Planet

So, whilst I try to figure out our next big-name focus of CMNS, let's take a look at Superman's solo title.  The first story was reprinted from Action Comics #1, but the origin changed a bit:

As we saw in Action Comics #1, we were a bit hazy on who raised infant Clark.  But now, it turns out the Kents went right back to the orphanage where they had dumped him in the first place and decided they wanted to go all takesies-backsies.  I can't swear to it, but considering the first issue of the Superman solo book came out a year after the first issue of Action, I think we have one of the earliest and quickest examples of ret-conning an origin. 

It was an improvement to have the Kents raise Clark, and it certainly added some depth to the character.  

But he still wasn't quite invulnerable:

That scene always struck me as stupid.  Are you trying to keep your powers a secret or not?  Don't encourage the doctor to break more needles on your skin!

Anyway, I never really knew why Clark decided to be a reporter: 

That also makes a certain amount of sense.  It's not like they had police scanners back then.  And they didn't.  I looked it up.

Still no flying:

And this created logistical problems for Supes that we wouldn't see for long:

I guess at one point someone just said, "Can we just have the guy fly and be done with it?"

We'll take more of a looksee tomorrow, hepcats!  See you then!

Why Is Crime Like a Bottle of Olives?

You may have noticed on yesterday's cover that there was reference to "The Riddles of Dr. Riddle."  Well, consider this riddle:

Hmmmmm... a bad guy who leaves clues about the crimes he's going to commit in the form of a riddle?  Who does that remind you of?

Even non-comic book nerdlingers know the answer to that one: The Riddler, Batman's old foe.  

But there's a twist to this riddle:  Dr. Riddle came about first.  By a few years.

How about that?

Dr. Riddle also stands out in that he's one of the few Bulletman foes who didn't slap Bulletgirl silly.  But, to be fair, he never got close enough to her to do it.

Not like the Murder Prophet!:

Yeah, it is a pleasure to smack Bulletgirl.  I'm not so much with you on the murdering thing, but we have some common ground on the whole "smacking Bulletgirl" thing.

Of course, you can do that sort of thing to Bulletman:

And we all know I love it when people say, "AIEEEEE!"

But then along comes Grover Dill.  Google that.  You'll find the comparison hilarious, I assure you.

Wait for it... wait for it...

Well.... Touche! (tm!)

Ain't that the truth!

And then...

HA!  I stopped reading there and pretended Bulletman just flew away and let Bulletgirl take a dip in the boiling lead.  Let me have my happy ending, won't you?

See you tomorrow!

In Which I Find Myself Rooting for Villains Again

I've hit a bit of a dry spell on the Batman comics, as you might expect.  We're getting out of the Silver Age, so we may have to switch over to a different "big" title.  Any suggestions?  I don't think we've done Superman yet, but we haven't touched a Marvel book in a long time.  Any ideas?  Think about it and let's check out Bulletman #5:

Is Bulletgirl falling asleep back there?  I think she is.  She must be as bored with herself as the rest of us are.

Anyway, check out this villain:

Yes... it's The Dude.  Make your own The Big Lebowski joke here.

Over the course of this here comic book fun house, we've unearthed the Fop and the Dandy, and now we have the Dude.  We have found the Holy Trinity, my friends.

Hmmmm... Dude, I think the Joker wants to speak with you about stealing his "poison from flower on boutonniere" trick.

Well... it's nice of you to straighten out the dead man's clothing, but what the heck kind of reverse dickey are you wearing?  I mean, your collar and tie don't seem to be attached to an actual shirt.

Seriously, look at his neck up there!  I see skin where I shouldn't see skin if the man is truly wearing a buttoned shirt.  I expect more from a man who won't leave a corpse sloppily dressed.

He also had this:

And an electric cane.

And, since he's not an infant, he beat up Bulletgirl:

You know, it's hard for me to take Bulletman seriously when he's all upset at a guy called, "The Dude."  I don't know why it works when Batman refers to the Joker and it doesn't work here, but it doesn't.  How do you shout at your foe without sounding like a Southern California surfer?

"Dude!  Duuuuuuuuude!  I'm gonna getcha, Duuuuuuuude!"

Yeah, that doesn't work at all.

In another story, we have a villain whose gimmick is that he's fat.

Yes, that's it.

And he murders people who call him fat, which I think falls under "justifiable homicide," but the District Attorney doesn't seem to agree with me.

Oh, and because he's not an infant....

... he beats up Bulletgirl.

To be fair, he also beats up Bulletman:

For the record, Bulletman's artificially augmented physical abilities and his fancy anti-gravity helmet were no match for a portly, middle-aged man.

In other words, *I* could beat up Bulletman.

What finally does him in?

Well, it wasn't Bulletman.  They had to show him tripping over something and knocking himself out.  Because he's overweight.  That's what it takes to defeat an overweight person.  You just hope they trip over something and knock themselves out.  Everyone knows that.

And, of course, Bulletman and Bulletgirl made fun of the guy's weight all throughout the story because that's perfectly okay.  Fat people are always fair game for ridicule, right?

See you tomorrow!